From b04fe33f17b4c49fc2214e67099cedbd5462b5c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Chilton Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:30:40 +1200 Subject: [PATCH] Added issue asking for dependencies. --- issues/i_c98515e2.cil | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) create mode 100644 issues/i_c98515e2.cil diff --git a/issues/i_c98515e2.cil b/issues/i_c98515e2.cil new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d3c25e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/issues/i_c98515e2.cil @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +Summary: Allow dependencies between issues +Status: New +CreatedBy: Andrew Chilton +AssignedTo: Andrew Chilton +Inserted: 2008-07-01T03:23:39 +Updated: 2008-07-01T03:30:14 + +Francois suggested that allowing dependencies between issues would be +good. ie. this one here is dependent on that one over there (ie. the +other needs to be fixed first). + +I'd prefer to keep it generic, ie. you set the status to 'DependsOn' +and then you refer to the other issue in the description or a comment. + +If that were the case, then no code changes would be required. + +But... + +It sounds like people would want this as a separate field though, so +maybe we add it as follows. The top section of each issue would have a +new field (if applicable), called "DependsOn" and would refer to the +other issue number: + + DependsOn: cafebabe + +If we do this, do we need to add a 'Precedes' field to the other +issue? + +I'll ask the others for input. -- 2.39.5